AARO: a historical review of UAP investigations
An open report on investigated programmes and claims, whose findings must be read within their stated scope.
Sightings, declassified records and video analysis.
An open report on investigated programmes and claims, whose findings must be read within their stated scope.
A document about data quality and research methods, not confirmation of alien craft.
A useful case in which apparent speed depends on camera motion and distance.
The well-known infrared clip requires distinguishing sensor imagery from the motion of an object.
The January 8, 2008 reports led to disputed military statements and a civilian analysis of radar data obtained through FOIA. The records' existence does not itself confirm an extraordinary …
One of three historical Navy clips officially released by the Pentagon in 2020.
A 2000 Defence Intelligence report assessed the military relevance of UAP reports. Its proposed plasma mechanisms are not established explanations for every sighting.
On March 13, 1997 observers saw an earlier moving formation and a later row of bright lights. The flare explanation for the later display should not automatically be assigned to every earli…
A photograph attributed to spring 1990 became an emblem of the Belgian wave. In July 2011 its maker told RTL-TVI that he had photographed a suspended polystyrene model.
Reports in 1989–1990 prompted an F-16 interception. The military acknowledged a failure to identify the phenomena; radar locks did not establish an extraterrestrial vehicle.